Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate potential differences of magnitudes and durations associated with dosed myofascial release (MFR) on human fibroblast proliferation, hypertrophy, and cytokine secretions.

Methods

Bioengineered tendons (BETs) attached to nylon mesh anchors were strained uniaxially using a vacuum pressure designed to model MFR varying in magnitudes (0%, 3%, 6%, 9%, and 12% elongation) and durations (0.5 and 1-5 minutes). Conditioned media were analyzed for cytokine secretion via protein microarray (n = 2). Bioengineered tendons were weighted and fibroblasts extracted from the BET were assessed for total cell protein and proliferation via double-stranded DNA quantification (n = 5). All data were compared by a 1-way analysis of variance with post hoc Dunnett test and Student t test.

Results

Changing MFR magnitude and duration did not have an effect on total fibroblast cellular protein or DNA accumulation. However, we observed a stepwise increase in BET weight with higher-magnitude MFR treatments. Longer durations of MFR resulted in progressive increase in the secretions of angiogenin, interleukin (IL)-3, IL-8, growth colony–stimulating factor, and thymus activation–regulated chemokine. Alternatively, increasing strain magnitude induced secretions of IL-1β, monocyte chemoattractant cytokine, and regulated and normal T cell expressed and secreted chemotactic cytokine.

Conclusion

Cellular proliferation and hypertrophy were not significantly changed by any treatment. However, the change in total BET dry weight suggests that production of extracellular matrix protein may be up-regulated. Different MFR parameters induce secretions of a unique subset of cytokines and growth factors that can be further enhanced by increasing the magnitude and duration of treatment. If clinically translatable, these results suggest that variations to manual therapy biomechanical parameters may differentially affect physiological responses in vivo.

Full text available here.

Manual Therapy

There is limited understanding of how osteopaths make decisions in relation to clinical practice. The aim of this research was to construct an explanatory theory of the clinical decision-making and therapeutic approaches of experienced osteopaths in the UK.

Twelve UK registered osteopaths participated in this constructivist grounded theory qualitative study. Purposive and theoretical sampling was used to select participants. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews which were audio-recorded and transcribed. As the study approached theoretical sufficiency, participants were observed and video-recorded during a patient appointment, which was followed by a video-prompted interview. Constant comparative analysis was used to analyse and code data.

Data analysis resulted in the construction of three qualitatively different therapeutic approaches which characterised participants and their clinical practice, termed; Treater, Communicator and Educator. Participants' therapeutic approach influenced their approach to clinical decision-making, the level of patient involvement, their interaction with patients, and therapeutic goals. Participants' overall conception of practice lay on a continuum ranging from technical rationality to professional artistry, and contributed to their therapeutic approach. A range of factors were identified which influenced participants' conception of practice.

The findings indicate that there is variation in osteopaths' therapeutic approaches to practice and clinical decision-making, which are influenced by their overall conception of practice. This study provides the first explanatory theory of the clinical decision-making and therapeutic approaches of osteopaths.

Full text available here.

Pain

The relevance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings such as facet joint (FJ) effusion and edema in low back pain (LBP) is still unknown. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated the presence of these MRI findings in the lumbar spine (Th12-S1) and their association with pain evoked by manual segmental FJ provocation tests (spinal percussion, springing, and segmental rotation tests) in 75 subjects with current LBP (30days in the past 3months) compared with 75 sex- and age-matched control subjects. FJs were considered painful, if 1 provocation test triggered LBP. FJs were classified as true positives, if the same FJ was painful and showed effusion and/or edema. FJs with effusion and/or edema and painful FJs were present significantly more frequently in subjects with LBP, but these conditions were also common in control subjects (27% vs 21% and 50% vs 12%, respectively). Effusion and/or edema were present in 65 subjects with LBP (87%) and in 56 control subjects (75%, not significant); painful FJs were present in 68 (91%) and 29 (39%) (P<0.01) LBP and control subjects, respectively. True-positive findings occurred in 16% of LBP FJs and in 2% of control FJs (P<0.01); 46 LBP subjects (61%) and 9 control subjects (12%, P<0.01) had true-positive findings. Pain on provocation and FJ effusion and/or edema were significantly correlated only in patients with LBP. In conclusion, only true-positive findings (ie, concurrent effusion and/or edema and positive provocation test results in the same FJ) discriminate well enough between control subjects and subjects with current LBP, whereas neither effusion and/or edema nor FJ provocations tests alone are suitable to detect suspected FJ arthropathy.